<HTML>
<HEAD>
  <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="Adobe PageMill 3.0 Win">
  <TITLE>May 2001 (1)</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<P><CENTER><B><FONT SIZE="+2">Protection from Excessive Cover</FONT></B></CENTER></P>

<P>The National  Executive of the NUT has agreed, by a narrow
majority, to join the NASUWT in suspending its  Cover to Contract
action in return for talks with  the Government and local authorities
about how teacher shortage and the extra workload arising from
it can be alleviated. </P>

<P>Your local Executive Members, Ian Murch (Bradford) and Hazel
Danson (Kirklees) felt that we should have got something firmer
than just talks before calling off the action, and opposed the
decision.</P>

<P>Nevertheless, we are still all committed to measures to reduce
workload demands on teachers, and will not tolerate unreasonable
demands to cover for absences.</P>

<P>What does this mean for Bradford teachers?</P>

<P>The ballot which was to be held in Bradford this term to commence
such action will not  now take place unless the situation changes.</P>

<P>It is important, however, to be clear that the situation in
schools regarding cover should not be allowed to deteriorate as
a result of the action not being commenced.</P>

<P>With or without this action, individual teachers are under
no contractual obligation to cover for colleagues after the third
day of absence, or for unfilled vacancies. </P>

<P>There is a clause in the conditions of service which qualifies
this position, stating that teachers can be asked to cover if
every reasonable effort has been made to obtain a supply teacher,
and this clause sometimes causes difficulties. </P>

<P>But the National Union has made it clear that it considers
this clause relates only to exceptional circumstances, and that
it is a misuse of it to claim on a daily basis that supply teachers
are unavailable. </P>

<P>The NUT will continue to support  members in schools who are
being asked to cover after the third day of absence, or for unfilled
vacancies. We are determined to protect members from this unacceptable
burden. </P>

<P>Please get  in touch with the Union Office if there are cover
difficulties in your school.</P>

<P><CENTER><B><FONT SIZE="+2">&pound;100,000 AWARD FOR STRESS
ILLNESS</FONT></B></CENTER></P>

<P>Another NUT member has recently been awarded a large settlement
because of illness caused by stress. Alan Barber was awarded &pound;!00,000
in a claim against his employers, Somerset County Council. </P>

<P>The judge pointed out the brusque, autocratic and bullying
style of leadership of the then head teacher.  Despite complaints
about the pressure he was under, nothing was done by the head
or deputies to alleviate it.</P>

<P>This is yet another judgement against unsympathetic managers
who failed to act to reduce the workload of an employee who they
knew was suffering from work-related stress. It makes it clear
that it is inadequate for those in positions of responsibility
to simply say that everyone is under pressure. </P>

<P>Bradford NUT is able to conduct a stress survey in your school
if you so wish. The survey is designed to identify major &quot;stressors&quot;
in your school. Once the survey is done we request the school
management to do something to remove or reduce the effect of the
stressors.</P>

<P>Managements should, however, have carried out stress risk assessments.
If they have not been done in your school, please let us know.</P>

<P><CENTER><B><FONT SIZE="+2">NUT ANNUAL CONFERENCE - CARDIFF
2001</FONT></B></CENTER></P>

<P>During the four days of conference motions were passed on a
wide range of issues. This is a brief summary of some of their
contents.</P>

<P>Excessive Workload. A joint motion with NAS/UWT, ATL and UCAC
stating that, in the event of government failing to set up an
independent inquiry or take other effective measures to reduce
workload, these unions will take effective action, short of strike
action, initially to limit teachers&#146; working time to no more
than35 hours a week, starting in September.</P>

<P>Salaries.  Conference urges Government to establish an independent
inquiry into the pay and conditions of teachers, similar to the
one carried out in Scotland, and to negotiate its report with
the teacher unions and their employers.</P>

<P>Green Paper &quot;Schools: Building on Success&quot;. Condemnation
of term &#147;bog standard&#148;, and re-affirmation of belief
that equality of opportunity in education can only be achieved
through properly funded comprehensive education.</P>

<P>Professional Unity. Committing the Union to continue to work
towards closer co-operation between the teaching unions.</P>

<P>Teacher Shortage. Criticising the Government&#146;s response
to the crisis and identifying low pay and poor conditions as the
central reasons.</P>

<P>Allegations against Teachers. Committing the Union to consultations
with employers, police and social service organisations to produce
nationally agreed procedures for investigating complaints against
teachers, replacing damaging current practice of immediate suspension
followed by lengthy investigation.</P>

<P>Workload and National Contract.  Deploring failure of Government
to address the well-documented excessive workload and unacceptable
levels of stress suffered by teachers &#150; a National Contract
for all teachers in state sector is a major priority of the Union.</P>

<P>Exclusion of Pupils. To campaign for a strategy which protects
members and pupils from violence and disruption from pupils with
challenging behaviour whilst at the same time developing the capacity
of schools to meet these pupils&#146; needs and develop social
inclusion. Inclusion must be fully resourced and funded.</P>

<P>Privatisation. Union re-affirms its complete opposition to
the privatisation of the education service. The Union rejects
government strategy of allowing private companies to run local
education services, which inevitably places the interests of their
shareholders above those of the users and providers of the service.</P>

<P>Performance Management. Conference opposed the Performance
Management scheme introduced under the Education (School Teacher
Appraisal) Regulations 2000, and supported action against it.</P>

<P>Primary Curriculum and assessment.  Stating opposition to league
tables.</P>

<P>Early Years Education. Stating the Union&#146;s commitment
to high quality nursery education for all three and four year
olds.</P>

<P>Conference was, as usual, addresses by a number of speakers,
some receiving a warmer response than others. </P>

<P>In this General Election year David Blunkett was perhaps a
little less strident than usual in his attacks on union members
who do not agree with his policies. Tory Shadow minister Theresa
May, on the other hand, had calculated that an attack on the NUT
would gain some backwoods anti-union votes and accused us of being
an &quot;unreconstructed trade union&quot;, a comment which was
met with much applause. Lib. Dem. Spokesperson Phil Willis was
the friendliest, attacking the Government for not listening to
teachers. Marjorie Evans also spoke about her long and difficult
battle to clear her name from the false allegations made against
her, and paid tribute to the NUT for the support she had received.</P>

<P>Bradford delegates spoke on Workload, Salaries, Privatisation,
and Primary Curriculum and Assessment.</P>

<P><CENTER><B><FONT SIZE="+2">PUBLIC DEBATE </FONT></B></CENTER></P>

<P><CENTER><B><FONT SIZE="+2">SHOULD BRADFORD EDUCATION BE PRIVATISED?</FONT></B></CENTER></P>

<P><CENTER> 7:30pm on Thursday 10th May 2001</CENTER></P>

<P><CENTER>The French Ballroom<BR>
The Midland Hotel<BR>
Cheapside<BR>
Bradford<BR>
(Tea and coffee will be available from 7:10pm)</CENTER></P>

<P>Main Speakers:- 	<BR>
<B>John Illingworth</B>, National Union of Teachers President<BR>
<B>David Ward</B>, Education Portfolio Holder for Bradford Council<BR>
<B>Terry Rooney</B>, MP for Bradford<BR>
</P>

<P><A HREF="../newsletter.htm">newsletters</A></P>

<P><A HREF="../index.htm">home</A><BR>

</BODY>
</HTML>

